Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 15 September 2022

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2022-09-16-qd-dinh-penalty-media-release

At a glance

Penalty
$4,662
Employees affected
1
Awards cited
MA000047

What happened

Quang Dung Dinh, a sole trader operating a residential building and construction services business in Melbourne, failed to comply with a Compliance Notice. A worker employed as a full-time general labourer between January and February 2021, requested assistance from the Fair Work Ombudsman. An inspector believed the worker was underpaid minimum wage, overtime, and penalty rates for weekend and public holiday work, paying an hourly rate of $20.71 for some hours. The Fair Work Ombudsman commenced an investigation and issued a Compliance Notice in August 2021.

What was decided

The Federal Circuit and Family Court imposed a $4,662 penalty against Quang Dung Dinh. He was ordered to comply with the Compliance Notice, which includes calculating and rectifying the underpayments, plus superannuation and interest. Fair Work Ombudsman Sandra Parker stated that failing to act on Compliance Notices can result in court-imposed penalties. The Fair Work Ombudsman encourages employees with pay concerns to seek free advice and assistance.

What it means for employers

Employers must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in court-imposed penalties and the obligation to back-pay workers, including superannuation and interest. Ignoring Compliance Notices can lead to legal action.

What it means for employees

Employees who believe they have been underpaid or are concerned about their entitlements should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free advice and assistance. Interpreter services are available.

underpaymentpenalty-ratesgeneral-protectionsmodern-award-variation

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2022-media-releases/september-2022/20220916-qd-dinh-penalty-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases