Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 29 June 2022

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2022-06-30-stacey-dale-litigation-media-release

At a glance

Respondent
Daily Cleaning Services
Penalty
$1,607
Employees affected
1

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman commenced legal action against the Applicant and her husband, who operate Daily Cleaning Services in Ararat, Victoria. The action followed a request for assistance from an international student who worked as a casual cleaner for Mrs Dale between March and August 2019. A Fair Work Inspector issued a Compliance Notice in March 2020, alleging underpayment of casual minimum wages and penalty rates. It is alleged that approximately $2,100 remains owing. The couple allegedly failed to comply with the Compliance Notice.

What was decided

The Federal Circuit and Family Court imposed penalties of $1,606.50 against the Applicant and $2,142 against her husband. The Applicant was ordered to rectify the alleged underpayment in full, including interest and superannuation, as outlined in the Compliance Notice. The Fair Work Ombudsman is seeking further penalties and an order for the Applicant to comply with the Compliance Notice. A directions hearing is scheduled for August 2022.

What it means for employers

Employers must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in significant penalties. Ensure accurate record-keeping and wage calculations to avoid underpayment claims and potential legal action.

What it means for employees

Employees who believe they have been underpaid should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free assistance. Visa holder workers and small businesses can find resources on the Fair Work Ombudsman’s website.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

underpaymentpenalty-ratesgeneral-protectionscompliancecasual-conversion

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2022-media-releases/june-2022/20220630-stacey-dale-litigation-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases