Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 13 June 2022

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2022-06-14-absolute-thai-penalty-media-release

At a glance

Respondent
Absolute Thai Melbourne Pty Ltd
Penalty
$19,980
Employees affected
1

What happened

Absolute Thai Melbourne Pty Ltd, which operated a restaurant called Wokks in Carlton, and its director Ronald Nah, have been penalised by the Federal Circuit and Family Court. This followed a Fair Work Ombudsman investigation into unpaid entitlements for a food and beverage attendant employed on a casual basis from July 2019 to July 2020. The company failed to comply with Compliance Notices requiring back-payment of entitlements. The worker requested assistance from the Fair Work Ombudsman.

What was decided

The court imposed a $16,650 penalty on Absolute Thai Melbourne Pty Ltd and a $3,330 penalty on Ronald Nah. The company was also ordered to comply with the Compliance Notice and back-pay the worker. Judge Catherine Symons stated the penalty should deter similar conduct and ensure compliance with minimum standards. The Fair Work Ombudsman emphasised the importance of complying with Compliance Notices and taking action to improve compliance in the restaurant sector.

What it means for employers

Employers must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in significant court-imposed penalties. The Fair Work Ombudsman prioritises compliance in the fast food, restaurant, and café sectors.

What it means for employees

Employees who believe they have been underpaid or are not receiving their correct entitlements should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free advice and assistance. Interpreter services are available.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

underpaymentpenalty-ratesgeneral-protectionsmodern-award-variationcasual-conversion

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2022-media-releases/june-2022/20220614-absolute-thai-penalty-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases