Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 28 May 2026

the Applicant v ALDI Foods Pty Ltd as General Partner of ALDI Stores (A Limited Partnership)

Citation: [2026] FWC 1987

What happened

the Applicant brought an application for an unfair dismissal remedy against ALDI Foods Pty Ltd. The Fair Work Commission considered whether ALDI had a valid reason for dismissing the Applicant and whether the dismissal was harsh. The case number was U2025/17245.

What was decided

the Commissioner dismissed the Applicant’s application. The Commission found that ALDI had a valid reason for the dismissal. It also determined that the dismissal was not harsh. As a result, the application was dismissed. The Commission cited Bartlett, Mark v Ingleburn Bus Services Pty Ltd T/A Interline Bus Services in its reasoning.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure they have a valid reason for any dismissal and carefully consider whether the dismissal is harsh, taking into account the employee's personal circumstances and the employer's own procedures.

What it means for employees

Employees who believe they have been unfairly dismissed should seek legal advice to understand their rights and options. A valid reason for dismissal and whether the dismissal was harsh are key factors in unfair dismissal claims.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc1987.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases