Mr William Stephenson v Cirrus AG Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWC 1982
What happened
William Stephenson sought an unfair dismissal remedy from Cirrus AG Pty Ltd. The Fair Work Commission considered an application for an extension of time regarding this remedy. The details of the circumstances leading to the dismissal are not provided in the text.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the application for an extension of time. Commissioner Lim found there were no exceptional circumstances to justify the delay. As such, the application for an unfair dismissal remedy was also dismissed. The Commission stated, 'Application for an unfair dismissal remedy – extension of time – no exceptional circumstances – application dismissed.'
What it means for employers
Employers should be aware of time limits for lodging applications with the Fair Work Commission. Failure to meet these deadlines can result in applications being dismissed, even if there are underlying merits.
What it means for employees
Employees seeking remedies from the Fair Work Commission, such as unfair dismissal claims, must adhere to strict time limits. Seeking an extension requires demonstrating exceptional circumstances, which are rarely granted.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate AI goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/document-view/decisions/mr-william-stephenson-v-cirrus-ag-pty-ltd-2026-fwc-1982Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →