Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 28 May 2026

the Applicant v Priceline Knox

Citation: [2026] FWC 1949

What happened

the Applicant commenced employment with Priceline Knox. The matter concerns a dispute related to a contract of employment and entitlements under the National Employment Standards (NES) or a safety net contractual entitlement. The Fair Work Commission was asked to determine if a dispute existed.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission, presided over by the Commissioner and a Deputy President, considered the case. The decision states, 'The matter concerns a dispute related to a contract of employment and entitlements under the National Employment Standards (NES) or a safety net contractual entitlement'. The Commission did not provide further details regarding the outcome of the dispute.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure contracts of employment and related agreements clearly outline employee entitlements and comply with the National Employment Standards. This helps avoid disputes and potential Fair Work Commission involvement.

What it means for employees

Employees should carefully review employment contracts and understand their entitlements under the National Employment Standards. If a dispute arises, seeking legal advice is recommended.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionsenterprise-agreement

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc1949.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases