[2025] FWCFB 6
What happened
Dylan Macnish, a cabin crew member for Virgin Airlines Australia, was dismissed after consuming a glass of prosecco at a Christmas party approximately 7.5 hours before a flight. Virgin Airlines has an 'eight-hour rule' prohibiting alcohol consumption before duty. Macnish believed this rule was a guideline and disclosed his alcohol consumption to a supervisor, consulting the Drug and Alcohol Management Program (DAMP) Manual for guidance. He used a breathalyser and confirmed a zero BAC level before reporting for duty. Virgin Airlines initially alleged multiple misconducts, including fatigue risk management system breaches, but ultimately focused on the alcohol consumption breach. Macnish self-reported rumors of being drunk on duty.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission initially ordered Virgin Airlines to reinstate Macnish, finding his dismissal unfair. Virgin appealed this decision, arguing the reinstatement was manifestly unreasonable or plainly unjust. The Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission dismissed Virgin's appeal. The bench acknowledged Macnish breached the eight-hour rule but found it was not unreasonable for him to believe it was a guideline. They also considered Macnish's steps to ensure fitness for duty and his self-reporting of the incident. The order for reinstatement remains in place.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure policies are clear and unambiguous, particularly regarding safety-critical roles. Regularly communicate policies and provide adequate training. Consider the reasonableness of employee interpretations of policies, especially when guidelines are presented. Encourage open communication and self-reporting of potential breaches, and avoid relying on outdated or unsubstantiated allegations.
What it means for employees
Employees should seek clarification on company policies and understand their obligations. If unsure about a policy's interpretation, seek guidance from supervisors or HR. Taking steps to ensure fitness for duty and proactively addressing potential issues can mitigate risks.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.