Mr David Knezevic v Linked Community Services Limited
Citation: [2025] FWC 3629
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
David Knezevic commenced an application for unfair dismissal against Linked Community Services Limited. The matter was listed for a hearing, but Mr Knezevic did not attend. The Commission initiated a dismissal under section 587 of the Fair Work Act, effectively dismissing the application for want of prosecution.
What was decided
Deputy President Easton dismissed Mr Knezevic’s application for unfair dismissal. The Commission found that Mr Knezevic failed to attend the scheduled hearing. The Commission can dismiss an application if the applicant does not attend a hearing, as per section 587 of the Fair Work Act. The decision references a previous case, *Viavattene v Australian Postal Corporation* [2013] FWCFB 2532, which outlines the principles for dismissing applications for failing to attend.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure employees are aware of scheduled hearings and the consequences of failing to attend. Proper communication and reminders can help prevent applications from being dismissed due to non-appearance.
What it means for employees
Employees must attend scheduled hearings or make arrangements to have representation. Failure to do so can result in the dismissal of the application, losing the opportunity to have the matter heard.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/document-view/decisions/mr-david-knezevic-v-linked-community-services-limitedWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →