Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 December 2024

the Applicant v iProperty Express Pty Ltd

Citation: [2025] FWC 3420

What happened

the Applicant brought an application for an unfair dismissal remedy against iProperty Express Pty Ltd. The Fair Work Commission considered whether her termination was harsh, unjust, or unreasonable. Deputy President Masson heard the case.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application for an unfair dismissal remedy. The Commission found her termination was not harsh, unjust, or unreasonable. The decision is documented as [2025] FWC 3420.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure termination decisions are carefully considered and documented to demonstrate fairness and reasonableness. This helps mitigate the risk of unfair dismissal claims.

What it means for employees

Employees who believe they have been unfairly dismissed should seek legal advice and consider lodging an application with the Fair Work Commission. However, the Commission will assess if the dismissal was harsh, unjust, or unreasonable.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc3420.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases