the Applicant v Disability Talk Pty Ltd
Citation: [2025] FWC 2924
What happened
the Applicant commenced proceedings in the Fair Work Commission seeking an unfair dismissal remedy from Disability Talk Pty Ltd. She filed her application 40 days after the relevant date. The Fair Work Commission’s rules generally require applications to be filed within 21 days, with extensions possible in limited circumstances. the Applicant did not seek an extension of time.
What was decided
Deputy President Clancy dismissed the Applicant's application. The Commission found she did not obtain an extension to the 21-day filing deadline. As such, the application was filed out of time. The Commission stated that it was not appropriate to grant an extension in this case.
What it means for employers
Employers should be aware of the strict time limits for filing Fair Work applications. Employees must adhere to these deadlines or seek an extension before the deadline expires. Failure to do so can result in applications being dismissed.
What it means for employees
Employees who believe they have been unfairly dismissed should file their application promptly. If an employee anticipates difficulty meeting the 21-day deadline, they should apply for an extension before the deadline passes.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc2924.pdfSend your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections