Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2025

the Applicant v Charles Services Pty Ltd

Citation: [2025] FWC 2729

What happened

the Applicant brought an application for an unfair dismissal remedy against Charles Services Pty Ltd. The Commission considered whether the application had reasonable prospects of success. Deputy President Easton was involved in the decision.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission found the Applicant’s application for an unfair dismissal remedy had no reasonable prospects of success. The Commission dismissed the application. The decision notes the application was brought under s.587(1)(c) at the Commission’s initiative.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure they have a clear basis for dismissal decisions and are prepared to defend those decisions if challenged. The Commission’s decision to dismiss an application without a hearing highlights the importance of proper procedures and documentation.

What it means for employees

Employees should carefully consider whether their claim has reasonable prospects of success before lodging an application with the Fair Work Commission. The Commission can dismiss applications it deems to have no reasonable prospects.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc2729.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases