Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 December 2024

the Applicant v M.J. Harris Group Pty Ltd

Citation: [2025] FWC 2442

What happened

the Applicant commenced employment with M.J. Harris Group Pty Ltd. The company is in the construction industry. the Applicant resigned from his position. The Fair Work Commission found that he was effectively dismissed because he was not paid for his work. the Deputy President heard the application.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission found the Applicant’s dismissal was unfair. the Deputy President determined that his resignation was, in substance, a dismissal because he was not paid. The Commission considered arguments about whether the resignation was voluntary. It found that the failure to pay wages resulted in a dismissal. No penalty was ordered.

What it means for employers

Employers must ensure timely payment of wages to avoid constructive dismissal claims. Failure to pay wages can be interpreted as a dismissal, even if an employee formally resigns.

What it means for employees

Employees who are not paid for their work may be considered unfairly dismissed, even if they resign. This highlights the importance of receiving wages and the potential legal recourse if payment is not received.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalunderpaymentgeneral-protectionspenalty-rateswage-theft

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc2442.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases