the Applicant v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd
Citation: [2025] FWC 1825
What happened
the Applicant commenced employment with Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd. The Fair Work Commission heard an application for relief from an unfair dismissal. the Applicant was absent from work for a prolonged period. Coles requested medical information from her, which she did not provide. The company subsequently dismissed her.
What was decided
Deputy President Easton found Coles had a valid reason for dismissing the Applicant. The company also ensured procedural fairness was followed. The Deputy President concluded the dismissal was not harsh, unjust, or unreasonable. The application for relief from unfair dismissal was therefore dismissed. The decision references previous cases including *Sydney Trains v Cahill* and *Bartlett, Mark v Ingleburn Bus Services Pty Ltd*.
What it means for employers
Employers can legitimately dismiss employees for failing to provide requested medical information, provided they have a valid reason and follow fair procedures. Regularly requesting and reviewing employee medical information is important.
What it means for employees
Employees have a responsibility to provide reasonable requests for information from their employer. Failure to do so may lead to dismissal.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc1825.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →