[2025] FWC 1696
Citation: [2025] FWC 1696
What happened
Australian Concert and Entertainment Security Pty Ltd (ACES) sought costs against the Respondent, who represented the Applicant in an unfair dismissal claim. The Applicant was dismissed from ACES as a security guard following an incident at a hospital involving a police officer. ACES alleged the Respondent’s actions, including sending an email with a settlement offer and failing to attend a conciliation conference, caused them to incur unnecessary costs. The Respondent claimed his actions were based on instructions from the Applicant and that communications were primarily by phone due to language barriers. ACES rejected the settlement offer and the Respondent did not attend the scheduled conciliation conference, claiming the Commission had been informed of their intention not to participate, though this email was not received.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission Deputy President Slevin found that the Respondent’s actions in representing the Applicant caused ACES to incur costs. The Deputy President proposed to order the Respondent to pay ACES $28,952.20 on account of those costs. The Respondent will be given an opportunity to respond to this proposed order. The decision highlights the importance of proper communication and adherence to procedures in Fair Work proceedings.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc1696.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections