Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 January 2025

[2025] FWC 169

Citation: [2025] FWC 169

What happened

the Applicant was employed by MSS Strategic Medical and Rescue Pty Ltd (MSS), providing medical and rescue services, including at a mine site. On 24 April 2024, while responding to an emergency call, the Applicant drove at high speeds (initially 113 km/h in a 60 km/h zone) on a haul road. His access to the site was later withdrawn by the client, BMA. MSS offered him an alternative role, which he declined. MSS terminated his employment, citing frustration of contract and serious misconduct due to his speeding. the Applicant denies misconduct and seeks reinstatement or compensation.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission found that the Applicant was unfairly dismissed. The Commission determined that MSS had a valid reason for dismissal, both due to the client withdrawing site access and due to the Applicant’s serious misconduct. The Commission found that MSS properly notified the Applicant of the reasons for his dismissal and provided opportunities for him to respond. The Commission rejected the Applicant’s arguments that the dismissal was unfair, noting the seriousness of his actions and the lack of a clear policy regarding emergency driving procedures.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissal

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc169.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases