Mr Soheil Hanify v Get AI Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWC 387
What happened
Mr Soheil Hanify sought an unfair dismissal remedy from the Fair Work Commission. The case number was U2025/20175. Get AI Pty Ltd was the respondent. Deputy President Colman heard the case.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed Mr Hanify’s application. The decision states the application was dismissed because the time limit for lodging it had expired. The Commission did not extend the time limit.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure they are aware of the time limits for lodging applications with the Fair Work Commission. Failure to do so can result in applications being dismissed.
What it means for employees
Employees need to be mindful of the strict time limits for lodging applications with the Fair Work Commission. Missing these deadlines can prevent a case from being heard.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/document-view/decisions/mr-soheil-hanify-v-get-ai-pty-ltd-2026-fwc-387Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →