the Applicant v Arrow Corporate Flooring Systems Pty. Limited
Citation: [2026] FWC 338
What happened
the Applicant, an employee, sought an unfair dismissal remedy from Arrow Corporate Flooring Systems Pty. Limited. The Fair Work Commission found that the Applicant’s application was not made in accordance with the Fair Work Act and the application fee was not paid or waived. The case was identified as U2025/17631.
What was decided
Deputy President Easton dismissed the Applicant’s application for an unfair dismissal remedy. The Commission found the application was not made in accordance with the Fair Work Act, and the application fee was not paid or waived. The decision references a previous case, Mr Alan Geoffrey Bond v Carbridge Pty Ltd T/A Carbridge.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure employees are aware of the requirements for lodging applications with the Fair Work Commission, including payment of applicable fees or eligibility for a waiver. Failure to comply with procedural requirements can lead to applications being dismissed.
What it means for employees
Employees seeking to make an application to the Fair Work Commission need to be aware of the requirements outlined in the Fair Work Act, including paying the application fee or obtaining a waiver. Failure to do so may result in the application being dismissed.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc338.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →