Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 31 December 2025

Moussa Mathew Germanos v Arrow Corporate Flooring Systems Pty. Limited

Citation: [2026] FWC 338

What happened

Moussa Mathew Germanos, an employee, sought an unfair dismissal remedy from Arrow Corporate Flooring Systems Pty. Limited. The Fair Work Commission found that Mr Germanos’s application was not made in accordance with the Fair Work Act and the application fee was not paid or waived. The case was identified as U2025/17631.

What was decided

Deputy President Easton dismissed Mr Germanos’s application for an unfair dismissal remedy. The Commission found the application was not made in accordance with the Fair Work Act, and the application fee was not paid or waived. The decision references a previous case, Mr Alan Geoffrey Bond v Carbridge Pty Ltd T/A Carbridge.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure employees are aware of the requirements for lodging applications with the Fair Work Commission, including payment of applicable fees or eligibility for a waiver. Failure to comply with procedural requirements can lead to applications being dismissed.

What it means for employees

Employees seeking to make an application to the Fair Work Commission need to be aware of the requirements outlined in the Fair Work Act, including paying the application fee or obtaining a waiver. Failure to do so may result in the application being dismissed.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionsother

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/document-view/decisions/moussa-mathew-germanos-v-arrow-corporate-flooring-systems-pty-limited-2026

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases