the Applicant v Cull & Harding Pty Ltd
Citation: [2026] FWC 182
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
the Applicant commenced employment with Cull & Harding Pty Ltd. She subsequently filed an application for unfair dismissal. The Fair Work Commission considered whether the Applicant was unfairly dismissed or whether she resigned. The company is described as a business. The Commission noted that the employee resigned.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission dismissed the Applicant’s application for unfair dismissal. The Commission found that the Applicant resigned from her employment and was not forced to resign. The application was dismissed on a jurisdictional objection. As stated in the decision, “the Applicant v Cull & Harding Pty Ltd – [2026] FWC 182”, the application was dismissed because “employee resigned – no forced resignation – jurisdictional objection upheld”.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure that resignation processes are clearly documented and understood by employees. This helps to distinguish between a voluntary resignation and an unfair dismissal situation.
What it means for employees
Employees should carefully consider their actions and the circumstances surrounding their departure from employment. A resignation, even if contentious, may not constitute an unfair dismissal.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc182.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →