Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 31 December 2025

Mrs Jaidyn Bowden v Cull & Harding Pty Ltd

Citation: [2026] FWC 182

At a glance

Employees affected
1

What happened

Mrs Jaidyn Bowden commenced employment with Cull & Harding Pty Ltd. She subsequently filed an application for unfair dismissal. The Fair Work Commission considered whether Mrs Bowden was unfairly dismissed or whether she resigned. The company is described as a business. The Commission noted that the employee resigned.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission dismissed Mrs Bowden’s application for unfair dismissal. The Commission found that Mrs Bowden resigned from her employment and was not forced to resign. The application was dismissed on a jurisdictional objection. As stated in the decision, “Mrs Jaidyn Bowden v Cull & Harding Pty Ltd – [2026] FWC 182”, the application was dismissed because “employee resigned – no forced resignation – jurisdictional objection upheld”.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure that resignation processes are clearly documented and understood by employees. This helps to distinguish between a voluntary resignation and an unfair dismissal situation.

What it means for employees

Employees should carefully consider their actions and the circumstances surrounding their departure from employment. A resignation, even if contentious, may not constitute an unfair dismissal.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionsredundancyunderpaymentsham-contractingmodern-award-variationenterprise-agreement

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/document-view/decisions/mrs-jaidyn-bowden-v-cull-harding-pty-ltd-2026-fwc-182

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases