Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 2026

the Applicant v Sydney Zoo Pty Ltd

Citation: [2026] FWC 1739

What happened

the Applicant commenced proceedings in the Fair Work Commission seeking an unfair dismissal remedy. The Fair Work Commission document indicates this was an application for an unfair dismissal remedy, and the application was refused. The document does not provide details about the circumstances of her employment or the reasons for her dismissal, nor does it detail the nature of her role at Sydney Zoo Pty Ltd.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission refused the Applicant’s application for an extension of time and subsequently dismissed the application for an unfair dismissal remedy. The document states, 'Application for unfair dismissal remedy – extension of time – extension of time refused – application dismissed'.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure they adhere to Fair Work Commission timelines for responding to applications and claims. Failure to do so can result in applications being refused.

What it means for employees

Employees seeking to make an unfair dismissal claim must be mindful of the time limits imposed by the Fair Work Act. Missing these deadlines can prevent a claim from being heard.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protections

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc1739.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases