Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 31 December 2025

CFMEU (105N) v KPI services (NSW) Pty Ltd

Citation: [2026] FWC 1694

What happened

The CFMEU (105N) sought clarification regarding the correct classification of traffic control workers employed by KPI Services (NSW) Pty Ltd. The dispute arose under a collective agreement, the KPI Services (NSW) Pty Ltd / CFMEU Collective Agreement 2024-2027. The union argued that the workers were not correctly classified, but the employer maintained its position.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission ruled in favour of the CFMEU. The Commission found that the collective agreement’s wording was clear and that the employer’s arguments could not override the agreement's plain meaning. The decision resolved the dispute regarding the classification of the traffic control workers.

What it means for employers

Employers should carefully review their enterprise agreements and ensure that their classifications of employees align with the agreement's wording. Arguments against the plain meaning of an agreement are unlikely to succeed.

What it means for employees

Employees should be aware of their rights under enterprise agreements and seek clarification from their union if they believe their classification is incorrect. Agreements are legally binding documents.

general-protectionsenterprise-agreement

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/document-view/decisions/cfmeu-105n-v-kpi-services-nsw-pty-ltd-2026-fwc-1694

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases