Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 December 2025

The Australian Workers' Union (002N) v Veolia Environmental Services (Australia) Pty Ltd Trading AS Veolia

Citation: [2026] FWC 1641

What happened

The Applicant brought a dispute to the Fair Work Commission concerning a disagreement related to a workplace agreement. The dispute arose under the Veolia Environmental Services (Australia) Pty Ltd Viva Energy Refinery AWU Agreement 2023 – 2026. The Fair Work Commission was asked to consider whether there was a dispute about matters arising under the enterprise agreement and the National Employment Standards (NES).

What was decided

The Deputy President found that a dispute existed regarding matters arising under the enterprise agreement and the NES. The Commission did not provide further details on the nature of the dispute or its resolution. The decision was made on 31 December 2025.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure their enterprise agreements are clear and unambiguous to avoid disputes. Regular review and consultation with employees and unions can help prevent disagreements arising from the interpretation of agreements.

What it means for employees

Employees should be aware of their rights under enterprise agreements and the NES. If disagreements arise, seeking assistance from a union or the Fair Work Commission is an option.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

enterprise-agreementgeneral-protectionsmodern-award-variation

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc1641.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours. No account, nothing to cancel.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases