Mr Dean Henry v Reward Supply Co. Pty. Ltd.
Citation: [2026] FWC 149
What happened
Mr Dean Henry brought an application for an unfair dismissal remedy against Reward Supply Co. Pty. Ltd. The Fair Work Commission considered whether the application had reasonable prospects of success. The Deputy President, Easton DP, was involved in the decision.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission found that Mr Henry’s application for an unfair dismissal remedy did not have reasonable prospects of success. The Commission dismissed the application under section 587(1)(c) of the Fair Work Act. The decision was made at the Commission’s initiative.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure that dismissal processes comply with the Fair Work Act and relevant instruments. This includes considering whether a dismissal falls under a specific provision of the Act, such as section 587(1)(c).
What it means for employees
Employees should be aware that applications for unfair dismissal remedies are assessed based on whether they have reasonable prospects of success. If an application is deemed to lack reasonable prospects, it will be dismissed.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/document-view/decisions/mr-dean-henry-v-reward-supply-co-pty-ltd-2026-fwc-149Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →