Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 31 December 2025

Mr Nataniel Victor Stavila v Votraint No. 604 Pty. Limited

Citation: [2026] FWC 138

What happened

Mr Nataniel Victor Stavila brought a general protections application against Votraint No. 604 Pty. Limited. He alleged he was dismissed. The application was filed outside the 21-day time limit for commencing such proceedings. The Fair Work Commission heard the case.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission dismissed Mr Stavila’s application. Deputy President Saunders found he did not establish exceptional circumstances to justify the late filing. The Commission noted the application was brought outside the statutory time limit. The decision states, 'the application was brought outside the statutory time limit and no exceptional circumstances have been established to justify the late filing.'

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware of the strict time limits for filing general protections applications. Failure to file within the 21-day period requires demonstrating exceptional circumstances, which are rarely found.

What it means for employees

Employees need to be aware of the 21-day time limit for filing general protections applications. Seeking legal advice promptly is crucial if you believe your workplace rights have been breached.

general-protectionsunfair-dismissal

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/document-view/decisions/mr-nataniel-victor-stavila-v-votraint-no-604-pty-limited-2026-fwc-138-0

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases