the Applicant v Department Of Education (State Of Victoria)
Citation: [2026] FWC 129
What happened
the Applicant, an employee of the Department of Education (Victoria), sought an unfair dismissal remedy. The Fair Work Commission document details the application, but provides no specifics about the circumstances leading to her dismissal. The document references previous cases, Jillian Troutbeck-Noy v Department of Education (State Of Victoria) and Qantas Airways Limited, and includes metadata about the document itself.
What was decided
The document indicates that the Fair Work Commission is dealing with an application for an unfair dismissal remedy. The document itself does not contain the decision or reasoning. It only confirms the case number (U2025/18585) and the document's publication date.
What it means for employers
The Department of Education (Victoria) should review its dismissal processes to ensure compliance with Fair Work Act requirements. This includes ensuring fair and transparent procedures are followed and that employees are given adequate opportunity to respond to concerns.
What it means for employees
Employees who believe they have been unfairly dismissed should consider lodging an application with the Fair Work Commission. It is important to gather all relevant documentation and evidence to support the claim.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2026fwc129.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →