Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 31 December 2025

Mr Filipe Nabainivalu v Woodward Foods Australia Pty Ltd

Citation: [2026] FWC 1189

What happened

Several employees, including Mr Filipe Nabainivalu, brought applications to the Fair Work Commission. They alleged issues related to their employment at Woodward Foods Australia Pty Ltd. The Commission found that the applications did not allege that the dismissals contravened Part 3-1 of the Fair Work Act. This part deals with unfair dismissal and related protections.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission, presided over by Deputy President Colman, dismissed the applications. The Commission stated it lacked the power to deal with the disputes as they were not related to allegations of unfair dismissal under Part 3-1 of the Fair Work Act. The decision states, 'the applications did not allege that the dismissals contravened Part 3-1'.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure that dismissal processes comply with the Fair Work Act, particularly Part 3-1 regarding unfair dismissal. This decision highlights the importance of understanding the specific grounds for an employee’s claim.

What it means for employees

Employees should clearly articulate the basis of their claims, particularly if alleging unfair dismissal. The Fair Work Commission will assess whether the claim falls under the relevant provisions of the Fair Work Act.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionsredundancymodern-award-variationenterprise-agreement

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/document-view/decisions/mr-filipe-nabainivalu-v-woodward-foods-australia-pty-ltd-2026-fwc-1189

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases