Skip to main content
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 10 March 2026

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2026-03-13-sham-contracting-media-release

At a glance

Penalty
$19,800
Employees affected
3

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman (FWO) and the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) are increasing their focus on sham contracting. This occurs when employers misclassify employees as independent contractors to avoid paying entitlements like superannuation, leave, and workers’ compensation. The ATO has observed concerning patterns in industries like building and construction and road freight. The FWO has investigations underway in sectors like building and construction and road transport. One company in Sydney faced penalties for terminating employees and re-engaging them as contractors.

What was decided

The FWO and ATO are warning employers about the consequences of sham contracting. Penalties under the Fair Work Act can be up to $19,800 for individuals, $99,000 for small businesses, and $495,000 or three times the underpayment amount for larger businesses. A Sydney health and wellness research company was penalized nearly $200,000 for terminating and re-engaging workers as contractors. Employers risk additional penalties and charges including PAYG withholding penalties and superannuation guarantee charges.

What it means for employers

Employers must accurately classify workers as employees or independent contractors. Misclassifying employees as contractors to avoid paying entitlements is illegal and can result in significant penalties. Employers should review their worker classification practices to ensure compliance with the Fair Work Act and other relevant legislation.

What it means for employees

Workers should be aware of the signs of sham contracting, such as being treated like an employee but classified as an independent contractor. If you believe you are being misclassified, you should seek advice from the Fair Work Ombudsman or a legal professional.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

sham-contractinggeneral-protectionspenalty-ratessuperannuationmodern-award-variationwage-theft

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2026-media-releases/march-2026/20260313-sham-contracting-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases