Fair Work Ombudsman
Citation: FWO-2025-02-19-setka-litigation-media-release
At a glance
- Respondent
- Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU)
- Penalty
- $18,780
What happened
The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) and its former Victorian Secretary, the Respondent. The legal action alleges the Respondent attempted to coerce the Australian Football League (AFL) into dismissing a witness, the AFL’s Head of Officiating. It's claimed the Respondent made public statements and published social media posts threatening disruption to AFL building projects if the witness was not dismissed. The actions allegedly occurred between May and June 2024.
What was decided
The Fair Work Ombudsman is seeking penalties against the Respondent and the CFMEU for alleged breaches of the Fair Work Act. The allegations relate to attempts to coerce the AFL and adverse action against a witness. The Commissioner stated that the legal action reflects the seriousness of the alleged conduct and aims to deter unlawful behaviour. Penalties are sought under sections 340 and 355 of the Fair Work Act.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure their officials and representatives understand their obligations under the Fair Work Act, particularly regarding coercion and adverse action. The case highlights the importance of maintaining workplace neutrality and respecting the rights of individuals to perform their duties without fear of intimidation or reprisal.
What it means for employees
Employees have the right to exercise workplace rights without fear of retaliation. This case demonstrates that attempts to coerce employers or take adverse action against employees who exercise those rights are unlawful and will be investigated.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2025-media-releases/february-2025/20250219-setka-litigation-media-releaseWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →