Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 1 October 2024

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2024-10-02-shotter-litigation-media-release

At a glance

Penalty
$8,274
Employees affected
2

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against Julie-Ann Shotter, the owner and operator of Jules Domestic Cleaning in Sydney. The investigation began after requests for assistance from two casual cleaners employed between August 2021 and March 2023. One worker was from Brazil and held a student visa. A Fair Work Inspector issued Compliance Notices in 2022 and 2023, alleging Ms. Shotter failed to pay minimum wages under the Cleaning Services Award 2020. It is alleged one worker was only paid for one of 13 weeks and the other, a student visa holder, received no pay for three days of work.

What was decided

The Fair Work Ombudsman is seeking penalties against Ms. Shotter for failing to comply with Compliance Notices requiring her to back-pay entitlements. The total amount allegedly owed, including superannuation, is $8,274. Ms. Shotter faces penalties of up to $6,660 for the 2022 notice and $9,390 for the 2023 notice. The court will also consider orders for Ms. Shotter to pay the alleged amounts owed to the workers, plus superannuation and interest. A directions hearing is scheduled for October 24, 2024.

What it means for employers

Employers, particularly those in the cleaning industry, must ensure they comply with workplace laws and pay employees their minimum entitlements under relevant awards. Failure to do so can result in significant penalties and court orders to back-pay wages. Employers should also be aware of their obligations to visa holders, who have the same workplace rights as Australian citizens.

What it means for employees

Employees, including visa holders, have the right to receive their minimum wages and entitlements. If you have concerns about your pay or working conditions, contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free assistance. Interpreter services are available.

underpaymentpenalty-ratesgeneral-protectionsvisa-holdersmodern-award-variationsham-contracting

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2024-media-releases/october-2024/20241002-shotter-litigation-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases