Fair Work Ombudsman
Citation: FWO-2024-04-26-melbourne-digital-penalty-media-release
At a glance
- Respondent
- Melbourne Digital Pty Ltd
- Penalty
- $21,578
- Employees affected
- 4
What happened
Melbourne Digital Pty Ltd, an IT company based in Melbourne, and its director Julian Smith have been penalised by the Federal Circuit and Family Court. This followed a Fair Work Ombudsman investigation into underpayment of entitlements to four workers, including software engineers, a user experience designer, and user interface/user experience designers. The workers were employed between one month and just over four months in 2021, and included individuals on temporary visas. The company failed to comply with two Compliance Notices requiring back-payment of wages, superannuation, and interest.
What was decided
The court imposed a penalty of $17,982 against Melbourne Digital Pty Ltd and $3,596 against Julian Smith. The company must now calculate and back-pay outstanding entitlements, estimated at approximately $35,468. The court found the failure to comply with Compliance Notices was serious and warranted a significant penalty. Acting Fair Work Ombudsman Michael Campbell emphasised the consequences of ignoring Compliance Notices. Judge Forbes stated the failure to comply with a statutory notice should be regarded as serious.
What it means for employers
Employers must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. Failure to do so can result in substantial penalties and back-pay orders. Businesses should ensure they understand their obligations regarding minimum wages, annual leave, superannuation, and interest. The Fair Work Ombudsman has resources available to help employers, including a Compliance Notice course.
What it means for employees
Employees, particularly those on temporary visas, should seek assistance from the Fair Work Ombudsman if they have concerns about their pay or entitlements. The Assurance Protocol protects visa holders who seek help. Free advice and assistance is available through the Fair Work Infoline and website.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2024-media-releases/april-2024/20240426-melbourne-digital-penalty-media-releaseWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →