Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 11 May 2025

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2025-05-12-veens-ligitation-media-release

At a glance

Penalty
$46,950
Employees affected
1
Awards cited
MA000127

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against Veens Group Pty Ltd, a housing construction company based in Harrington Park, Sydney, and its sole director, Dasi Shi. A Fair Work Inspector issued a Compliance Notice in June 2023 after suspecting the company failed to pay a 29-year-old Chinese construction worker, who held a student visa, for eight days in October 2022. The worker was allegedly entitled to minimum casual wages under the Building and Construction General On-Site Award 2020. The company allegedly failed to comply with the Compliance Notice, and Mr Shi is alleged to have been involved.

What was decided

The Fair Work Ombudsman is seeking penalties against Veens Group Pty Ltd and Dasi Shi for failing to comply with the Compliance Notice. The company faces a penalty of up to $46,950, and Mr Shi faces a penalty of up to $9,390. The court is also expected to order the company to comply with the Compliance Notice, including paying the worker’s outstanding entitlements plus interest. A directions hearing is scheduled for June 18, 2025.

What it means for employers

Employers must comply with Compliance Notices issued by the Fair Work Ombudsman. The Fair Work Ombudsman prioritises protecting young workers and migrant workers, and improving compliance in the construction industry. Failure to comply with a Compliance Notice can result in significant penalties.

What it means for employees

Employees, particularly young workers and visa holders, should seek advice and assistance from the Fair Work Ombudsman if they have concerns about their pay or entitlements. Free advice and assistance is available through the Fair Work Infoline and online resources.

unfair-dismissalunderpaymentcasual-conversionpenalty-ratesgeneral-protectionsmisclassificationmodern-award-variationwage-theft

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2025-media-releases/may-2025/20250512-veens-ligitation-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases