Fair Work Ombudsman
Citation: FWO-2025-05-05-mr-viet-penalties-media-release
At a glance
- Respondent
- Mr Viet trading as Mr Viet
- Penalty
- $802,000
- Employees affected
- 36
What happened
The Fair Work Ombudsman secured penalties and compensation after the Applicant and her partner, operators of two 'Mr Viet' Vietnamese eateries in Adelaide, underpaid 36 migrant workers. The workers, mostly Vietnamese international students aged under 25, were employed between January 2018 and September 2021. They were paid as little as $15 an hour, significantly below minimum wage. The couple also made employees pay for bubble tea and other items, and deducted money from pay for alleged customer errors. the Applicant attempted to deceive Fair Work inspectors by falsely claiming to back-pay workers.
What was decided
The Federal Court ordered the Applicant to back-pay $407,546 plus interest and superannuation. He received a $265,000 penalty, and his partner received a $130,000 penalty for her involvement. The court found the couple contravened workplace laws including underpaying minimum rates, failing to provide meal breaks, and giving false records to inspectors. Justice Stephen McDonald described the Applicant's actions as a 'calculated and dishonest course of conduct'.
What it means for employers
Employers must ensure they are paying employees at least the minimum wage and providing appropriate entitlements. Maintaining accurate records and being truthful with regulators is crucial. Exploiting vulnerable workers, particularly migrant workers, will result in significant penalties.
What it means for employees
Employees, especially those on visas, should be aware of their workplace rights and feel comfortable reporting any concerns to the Fair Work Ombudsman. Visa holders should be reassured that reporting breaches will not negatively impact their visa status.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2025-media-releases/may-2025/20250505-mr-viet-penalties-media-releaseWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →