Fair Work Ombudsman
Citation: FWO-2025-01-16-navasardyan-litigation-media-release
At a glance
- Respondent
- Griffon Alpha Group Pty Ltd
- Penalty
- $900,000
- Employees affected
- 44
- Awards cited
- MA000171
What happened
The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against the Respondent, the former operator of Griffon Alpha Group Pty Ltd, a now deregistered security company in Perth. It is alleged that the Respondent was involved in underpaying 44 security guards a total of $911,292 between December 2019 and May 2022. Many of the workers were visa holders from non-English speaking backgrounds. Griffon Alpha Group employed the workers on a casual basis at various venues and events. The company allegedly paid flat rates of $21 to $25 per hour, which did not cover entitlements under the Security Services Award 2010 and 2020.
What was decided
The Fair Work Ombudsman alleges serious contraventions of the Fair Work Act due to the underpayments. Because the alleged underpayments were knowingly and systematically carried out, they meet the definition of 'serious contraventions', attracting increased penalties. A directions hearing is scheduled for February 11, 2025, in the Federal Circuit and Family Court in Perth. The Fair Work Ombudsman is seeking penalties in court, with the Respondent facing potential penalties of up to $133,200 per contravention.
What it means for employers
Employers must ensure they are paying employees correct penalty rates, casual loadings, and shift allowances as outlined in relevant awards. Paying unlawfully low flat rates is unacceptable, particularly when vulnerable workers, such as visa holders, are involved. Employers should review their pay practices and seek advice from the Fair Work Ombudsman if unsure.
What it means for employees
Employees, especially visa holders, who believe they have been underpaid or denied entitlements should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman for free advice and assistance. Information and support are available in multiple languages.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2025-media-releases/january-2025/20250116-navasardyan-litigation-media-releaseWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + advisor access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →