Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 12 May 2024

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2024-05-13-foot-thai-penalty-media-release

At a glance

Penalty
$1,000,000
Employees affected
7

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman secured $966,890 in penalties against Colin Kenneth Elvin, his former company Foot & Thai Massage Pty Ltd, and Jun Millard Puerto. This followed a civil case involving seven Filipino workers who were exploited at the ‘foot&thai’ massage parlour in Belconnen, Canberra, between June 2012 and February 2016. The workers, who held 457 visas, were underpaid a total of $971,092 and subjected to coercion, discrimination, and threats, including threats to harm their families if they complained. Six employees were also required to pay back a portion of their wages. The Fair Work Ombudsman began investigating the parlour in 2016.

What was decided

The Federal Court imposed a $778,100 penalty against Foot & Thai Massage Pty Ltd, $150,140 against Colin Kenneth Elvin, and $38,650 against Jun Millard Puerto. The court also ordered them to pay a total of $1.166 million in back-pay and compensation to the workers, plus interest. Justice Anna Katzmann found the workers lived in fear of the parlour’s owner. Mr Elvin has appealed the liability and penalty decisions to the Full Federal Court. The penalties are the third-highest in the Fair Work Ombudsman’s history.

What it means for employers

Employers must ensure compliance with workplace laws, particularly when dealing with visa holders. Threats or coercion to prevent workers from exercising their rights are unacceptable and will result in significant penalties. Employers should be aware of increased penalties for exploitative conduct since 2017.

What it means for employees

Visa holder workers have the same workplace rights as all other Australian workers. Employees should feel safe to raise concerns about their employment without fear of reprisal, including threats to their families or visa status. If workers experience exploitation, they should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman.

underpaymentpenalty-ratesgeneral-protectionssham-contractingvisa-holdersmodern-award-variationwage-theft

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2024-media-releases/may-2024/20240513-foot-thai-penalty-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases