Skip to main content
FWOFair Work Ombudsman · 8 August 2022

Fair Work Ombudsman

Citation: FWO-2022-08-11-uni-of-melb-litigation-media-release

At a glance

Respondent
The University of Melbourne
Penalty
$66,600
Employees affected
2

What happened

The Fair Work Ombudsman has commenced legal action against The University of Melbourne. The University allegedly coerced and took adverse action against two casual academics to prevent them from claiming payment for work performed. One academic was not offered further teaching work after requesting payment for extra hours and making complaints. A supervisor allegedly threatened not to re-employ the academics if they claimed outside their contracted hours. The academics were engaged on short-term casual teaching contracts since at least 2016 and 2017. The alleged incidents occurred in August 2020 and February 2021.

What was decided

The Fair Work Ombudsman and The University of Melbourne filed a Statement of Agreed Facts on 25 August 2023. The Fair Work Ombudsman has amended the application, no longer alleging the University intended to coerce employees or take adverse action. The Court has ordered the matter to progress to a determination of penalties. The Fair Work Ombudsman continues to allege the University took adverse action against the academics because they exercised a workplace right. A separate investigation into alleged underpayments of University of Melbourne casual academic employees is ongoing.

What it means for employers

Employers must have proactive measures in place to ensure compliance with workplace laws. If employers suspect employees may be underpaid, they should promptly check and rectify any issues. Threats of non-re-employment to prevent employees from claiming entitlements are unlawful.

What it means for employees

Employees have the right to claim payment for work performed without fear of adverse action. If an employer threatens action to prevent an employee from exercising their workplace rights, they should contact the Fair Work Ombudsman.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

general-protectionspenalty-ratescasual-conversionunderpaymentwage-theft

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fairwork.gov.au/newsroom/media-releases/2022-media-releases/august-2022/20220811-uni-of-melb-litigation-media-release

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.

FairWork Mate AI

This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.

Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.

Just need this week sorted? A 7-Day Pass is 50 questions over 7 days, no account. Get a 7-Day Pass — $14.99

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections

All cases