[2026] FWCFB 27
What happened
This case involves a dispute between SC Hydro Pty Ltd and the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU) regarding the correct classification of employees driving concrete agitator trucks on the Snowy Hydro 2.0 project. The dispute centres on whether these employees should be classified as Tunneller Class 2 (TW2) or Tunneller Class 1 (TW3) under the SC Hydro Pty Ltd – AWU Tunnel and Associated Works Greenfield Agreement 2021 – 2025. Previous decisions by the Fair Work Commission and Full Bench had determined the employees should be classified as TW3. SC Hydro failed to implement these decisions, prompting the CFMEU to seek further orders from the Commission.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission Full Bench determined that it had the power to make further orders to resolve the dispute, despite SC Hydro’s argument that it was functus officio. The Full Bench found SC Hydro knowingly failed to comply with previous determinations. The Commission acknowledged its role as a private arbitrator in this dispute. The Full Bench did not specify the exact orders to be made, but indicated it would vary its earlier decision to include more specific requirements for SC Hydro to resolve the dispute. The Commission rejected SC Hydro's argument that it lacked the power to issue binding orders.
What it means for employers
Employers must diligently implement decisions made by the Fair Work Commission, even if they disagree with the outcome. Failure to do so can lead to further legal action and potentially more stringent orders from the Commission. Understanding the scope of enterprise agreement clauses and the Commission's powers in resolving disputes is crucial.
What it means for employees
Employees should be aware of their rights and entitlements under enterprise agreements and modern awards. If an employer fails to comply with a Fair Work Commission decision, employees can seek further action to enforce those decisions.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.