[2025] FWCFB 75
Citation: [2025] FWCFB 75
What happened
the Applicant was dismissed from her catering assistant role at Serco Australia Pty Limited after 18 years of employment. Serco stated her English literacy levels were insufficient for the role. The Applicant filed an unfair dismissal application, but missed a deadline to submit documents due to limited English skills and a misunderstanding of the Commission's directions. She requested an extension, which was denied. The Deputy President dismissed her application for failing to comply with directions. Serco’s legal representatives were aware of the missed deadline but did not request dismissal. the Applicant subsequently appealed the decision.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission Full Bench allowed the Applicant’s appeal and quashed the Deputy President’s decision to dismiss her unfair dismissal application. The Full Bench found the Applicant was denied procedural fairness. The Deputy President did not allow her a reasonable opportunity to present her case. The matter will be remitted to another member of the Commission for a new hearing. The Full Bench emphasised the importance of procedural fairness in Commission proceedings and the need for caution when dismissing applications for want of prosecution.
What it means for employers
Employers should be mindful of the importance of procedural fairness when responding to employee applications, particularly in cases involving language barriers or other circumstances that may hinder compliance with directions. It is crucial to ensure employees understand the requirements and deadlines and to consider whether extensions are appropriate.
What it means for employees
Employees with limited English skills or other difficulties understanding legal processes should seek assistance from support services or legal representatives. If facing challenges meeting deadlines or understanding Commission directions, it's important to communicate these difficulties promptly and request clarification or extensions.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwcfb75.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →