Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 January 2025

[2025] FWCFB 4

Citation: [2025] FWCFB 4

At a glance

Employees affected
1

What happened

the Applicant was unfairly dismissed from her part-time position as a food and beverage attendant at Gonva Group Pty Ltd, trading as the Cafetal Coffee Company. She worked at the cafe and was involved in importing, roasting, and wholesaling Colombian coffee. She raised concerns about public holiday pay and recorded a conversation with the Fair Work Ombudsman. Following this, she was dismissed via email by the Respondent, citing aggressive verbal behaviour. The initial decision by the Commissioner found Gonva had not complied with the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code and ordered compensation of $13,158.97 plus superannuation. Gonva appealed this decision, seeking a stay of the compensation order.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission Full Bench refused Gonva Group Pty Ltd’s appeal against a decision finding the Applicant was unfairly dismissed. The Full Bench found no arguable error in the initial decision and determined it was not in the public interest to grant permission to appeal. The initial decision stands, requiring Gonva to pay the Applicant compensation, with a subsequent variation allowing for instalment payments. The appeal sought to challenge the Commissioner’s consideration of the business’s viability and whether further inquiries were needed.

What it means for employers

Small businesses must adhere to the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code when dismissing employees. Employers should ensure they have reasonable grounds for dismissal and provide warnings and opportunities for improvement. Failing to do so can result in orders for compensation. Employers should also be mindful of cultural considerations and ensure compliance with industrial laws when addressing employee concerns.

What it means for employees

Employees have the right to raise concerns about their working conditions without fear of unfair dismissal. Employees should document any issues and seek advice from the Fair Work Ombudsman if necessary. If unfairly dismissed, employees can pursue a remedy through the Fair Work Commission.

Want this applied to your situation?

Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionssmall-businessmodern-award-variationpenalty-ratespublic-holidays

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwcfb4.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases