[2025] FWCFB 214
Citation: [2025] FWCFB 214
What happened
the Applicant worked as an Uber driver from November 2020 until he was deactivated on April 8, 2025. He filed an application for an unfair deactivation remedy in the Fair Work Commission on April 24, 2025. Uber voluntarily reactivated his account on May 19, 2025, and he resumed work. the Applicant and Uber agreed he is an 'employee-like' worker and that he performed work through Uber's digital labour platform under a services agreement. An altercation occurred between the Applicant and passengers, leading to Uber's deactivation of his account. the Applicant reported the incident to police.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission considered whether the Applicant was unfairly deactivated and whether Uber could be ordered to reactivate his account. Uber argued that no remedy was available because the Applicant’s account was already reactivated. The Commission found Uber had not discharged its onus to show the Applicant was not unfairly deactivated. While Uber had reactivated the Applicant’s account, the Commission stated that orders could still be made under the Fair Work Act. The parties are to confer on the quantum of an order to restore lost pay.
What it means for employers
Employers using digital labour platforms should ensure their deactivation processes comply with the Digital Labour Platform Deactivation Code. Even if an account is reactivated, the Commission can still order remedies for unfair deactivation, highlighting the importance of fair and transparent deactivation procedures.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwcfb214.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →