[2025] FWCFB 178
At a glance
- 1
What happened
the Applicant appealed a decision by the Commissioner Simpson regarding her application for an extension of time to file an unfair dismissal application. The Applicant was dismissed from Thejo Australia Pty Ltd. She filed her application 14 days late, and the Commissioner refused the extension, citing a lack of exceptional circumstances. the Applicant claimed mental health issues, homelessness, and confusion regarding jurisdictional filing requirements contributed to the delay. The Commissioner limited his review of evidence to the period between the dismissal and the application filing, which the Applicant contested.
What was decided
The Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission allowed the Applicant’s appeal. They found the Commissioner made a significant error by limiting the scope of evidence considered to the period between the dismissal and the application filing. The Full Bench determined that the Applicant’s mental health and homelessness prior to the dismissal could have impacted her ability to file on time. The extension of time application was redetermined, and exceptional circumstances were found, granting the extension.
What it means for employers
Employers should be aware that the Fair Work Commission may consider circumstances preceding a dismissal when assessing an application for an extension of time to file an unfair dismissal claim. It is important to be mindful of an employee's potential vulnerabilities and ensure clear communication regarding deadlines and processes.
What it means for employees
Employees facing dismissal who are experiencing mental health issues or homelessness should seek legal advice promptly and gather relevant documentation to support their case for an extension of time to file an unfair dismissal application. Evidence of pre-dismissal circumstances can be relevant.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.