Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 January 2025

[2025] FWCFB 13

Citation: [2025] FWCFB 13

At a glance

Employees affected
1

What happened

Mr Kuncho Kurtev was dismissed from his role as a Numerical Modeller at KCB Australia Pty Ltd on 21 June 2024, due to alleged performance issues. He was diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease on 17 July 2024, shortly after his dismissal. Mr Kurtev filed an application under the Fair Work Act 2009 on 24 July 2024, alleging his dismissal was due to a disability. This was 12 days out of the 21-day time limit. Commissioner Johns dismissed his application, finding no exceptional circumstances for an extension of time.

What was decided

The Full Bench allowed Mr Kurtev’s appeal against Commissioner Johns’ decision. They found there were exceptional circumstances justifying an extension of time for his application. The Full Bench considered the reasons for the delay, which related to Mr Kurtev’s diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease after his dismissal. They agreed that he could not have formulated his application without this diagnosis. The Bench noted the Commissioner did not properly consider the connection between his medical condition and the reasons for his dismissal.

What it means for employers

Employers should be aware that delays in employees making applications related to disability discrimination may be considered exceptional circumstances. It is important to consider the employee's perspective and any medical conditions that may have impacted their ability to pursue a claim within the standard timeframe.

What it means for employees

Employees experiencing health issues that may be related to their employment should seek legal advice promptly. Even if the initial time limit has passed, it may be possible to apply for an extension of time based on exceptional circumstances, such as a delayed diagnosis.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionsdisabilitylong-service-leavepenalty-ratescasual-conversionmodern-award-variationenterprise-agreement

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwcfb13.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases