[2025] FWCA 2640
Citation: [2025] FWCA 2640
What happened
Hawthorne Civil Pty Ltd sought approval for a Greenfields agreement, the GOLD COAST LIGHT RAIL STAGE 3 PROJECT AGREEMENT, with the Construction, Forestry and Maritime Employees Union (CFMEU). The Australian Workers Union (AWU) challenged the CFMEU’s right to represent a majority of employees and raised concerns about the public interest. the employer’s General Manager, and a representative of the CFMEU provided statutory declarations confirming the CFMEU’s representation rights. An email from the employer’s General Manager to a representative of the CFMEU detailed work requirements for the project. The AWU challenged the CFMEU’s representation of ‘Formwork Labourer’.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission approved the Greenfields agreement. the Commissioner found the CFMEU was entitled to represent a majority of employees covered by the agreement. The Commission accepted the employer’s and CFMEU’s statements regarding the agreement's benefits, including industrial certainty and comparable wages. The AWU’s challenge regarding the CFMEU’s representation of ‘Formwork Labourer’ was largely dismissed. The agreement will operate from 15 August 2025, expiring on 8 August 2029.
What it means for employers
Employers entering into Greenfields agreements must ensure accurate representation declarations are made regarding union coverage. Providing clear and detailed information about project requirements, as demonstrated in the email, can help clarify union roles and responsibilities. The Commission generally accepts statutory declarations as truthful unless challenged with evidence.
What it means for employees
Employees should be aware of which unions represent them and their rights under Greenfields agreements. The agreement provides for comparable wages and conditions to similar projects. The Commission considers the public interest when approving agreements, ensuring they don't disadvantage employees.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwca2640.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. The full FWC and Federal Court library behind every advisor answer is on Pro.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Just need today sorted? A Day Pass is 25 questions over 24 hours, no account. Get a Day Pass — $4.99
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections