[2025] FWC 872
Citation: [2025] FWC 872
What happened
Gabriel Walker was dismissed from his plumbing position at Plumbtrax Pty Ltd on December 17, 2024. He had worked there since September 7, 2021, and earned less than the high-income threshold of $175,000 annually. Plumbtrax alleged serious misconduct, including registering a competing business, Walker Environmental Services (WES), and promoting it during work hours. Walker admitted to registering WES but claimed he informed his employer about his plans. There's disagreement about when and how this information was shared. Walker denies making aggressive remarks during the termination meeting and denies promoting WES during work hours.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission found Mr. Walker was protected from unfair dismissal and that his dismissal was unfair. The Commission dismissed Plumbtrax's jurisdictional objection regarding the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code. While the dismissal wasn't consistent with the Code, reinstatement wasn't deemed appropriate. Compensation was ordered. The Commission noted inconsistencies in the evidence regarding communication about Walker’s new business and the circumstances surrounding the dismissal meeting.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure they follow proper procedures when dismissing employees, particularly those covered by a modern award or enterprise agreement. Accusations of misconduct must be clearly communicated and employees must be given a fair opportunity to respond. The Small Business Fair Dismissal Code is not a shield for unfair dismissals.
What it means for employees
Employees who believe they have been unfairly dismissed should apply to the Fair Work Commission within the required timeframe. If an employer alleges serious misconduct, employees should document any attempts to clarify the allegations and respond to them.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc872.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →