[2025] FWC 799
Citation: [2025] FWC 799
What happened
Anthony May, a Team Leader Planner Roll Workshop at Paper Australia Pty Ltd, initially started as an apprentice in 1985. He previously had an informal flexible working arrangement (FWA) allowing adjusted start and finish times on Thursdays to manage childcare responsibilities. This arrangement ended when Paper Australia implemented an audit requiring compliance with the enterprise agreement. Mr May then formally requested an FWA, which was rejected. The relevant enterprise agreement, the Opal Australian Paper Maryvale Mill Mechanical Maintenance & Engineering Store Enterprise Agreement 2024, includes clauses governing work hours and make-up time. Mr May seeks an order that Paper Australia grant his FWA request.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission found that Paper Australia’s refusal to grant Mr May’s flexible working arrangement request was not based on reasonable business grounds. The Commission considered Paper Australia’s argument that the request didn’t comply with the enterprise agreement and that the make-up time clause provided a suitable alternative. However, the Commission noted that the enterprise agreement includes a National Employment Standard precedence clause, meaning the NES prevails where it provides a more beneficial term. The Commission will issue orders to grant Mr May’s FWA request.
What it means for employers
Employers should be aware that simply citing non-compliance with an enterprise agreement is not automatically a reasonable business ground for refusing a flexible working arrangement request. They need to demonstrate a likely business detriment if the request is granted. Offering an alternative like make-up time may not be sufficient if it creates financial hardship for the employee.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc799.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →