Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 March 2025

[2025] FWC 668

Citation: [2025] FWC 668

What happened

Jacqueline Laughlin, a director of the Murray Grey Beef Cattle Society Limited, alleged she was bullied by the Society's President, John Contarino. She applied to the Fair Work Commission for an order to stop the bullying. The Society and Mr Contarino objected, arguing Ms Laughlin, as a director, was not a 'worker' under the Fair Work Act and therefore the Commission lacked jurisdiction. Ms Laughlin performed tasks such as marketing plan development, contacting promotion groups, and preparing documents for directors. She also incurred expenses, like driving to Melbourne for promotional materials.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission dismissed the objection that Ms Laughlin was not a 'worker'. The Commission found she met the definition of a 'worker' under the Work Health and Safety Act, as she performed work for the Society. The definition of 'worker' is broad and includes volunteers. The Commission did not rule on the bullying allegations themselves, but allowed Ms Laughlin’s application for a stop bullying order to proceed.

What it means for employers

Employers, particularly those with volunteer boards or committees, should understand the broad definition of 'worker' under the Fair Work Act. Individuals performing work for an organisation, even without pay, can be considered workers and entitled to protections. The Commission’s decision highlights that the quality or instruction of work is not relevant to determining worker status.

What it means for employees

Employees, including volunteers, should be aware that they may be considered 'workers' even if they are not paid. This means they may be entitled to protections under the Fair Work Act, even if they hold a position like a director. It's important to understand your rights and seek advice if you believe you are being bullied at work.

unfair-dismissalgeneral-protectionsmisclassificationvolunteerpenalty-ratespublic-holidaysmodern-award-variationenterprise-agreement

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc668.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases