[2025] FWC 634
Citation: [2025] FWC 634
What happened
Adriana Music (Applicant) initiated a claim for unfair dismissal against Sharesight Pty Ltd (Respondent). The Applicant was initially employed as a Project Delivery Manager in April 2021. In June 2023, she resigned from her employment and entered into an independent contractor agreement to continue providing services remotely from Canada. The Respondent argued the Applicant was not an employee, and therefore, the unfair dismissal claim was invalid. The Applicant and Respondent entered into a written independent contractor agreement, which governed the provision of services from June 2023 to July 2024.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission Deputy President Boyce dismissed the Applicant's unfair dismissal claim. The Commission found that the Applicant was not an employee of Sharesight Pty Ltd, but rather an independent contractor. This meant the requirements for a 'dismissal' under the Fair Work Act 2009 were not met, and the Commission lacked jurisdiction to hear the claim. The decision applied principles from the Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd case, which clarifies the distinction between employees and independent contractors.
What it means for employers
Employers should carefully review the nature of working arrangements, particularly when transitioning employees to independent contractor roles. Ensuring the written agreement accurately reflects the true nature of the relationship is crucial. Misclassifying employees as contractors can lead to legal challenges and potential penalties.
What it means for employees
Employees should carefully consider the terms and conditions of any agreement that changes their employment status. It's important to understand the implications of becoming an independent contractor, including the loss of employee entitlements.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc634.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →