[2025] FWC 391
Citation: [2025] FWC 391
What happened
the Applicant applied for unfair dismissal against Glenpickle Pty Ltd. Initially, the Fair Work Commission found the dismissal unfair due to Glenpickle's absence from the first hearing and the Applicant’s failure to provide materials to Glenpickle. However, the decision was revoked after Glenpickle argued the Applicant misled them into believing she had abandoned her claim. At a redetermination conference, the Applicant claimed a colleague promised visa sponsorship and then falsely accused her, leading to her dismissal. Glenpickle’s witnesses, a witness and a colleague, presented conflicting evidence, detailing performance concerns and a meeting where the Applicant was rude.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission revoked its earlier decision and redetermined the unfair dismissal application. The Commissioner found that the Applicant’s conduct at a meeting and her overall performance were valid reasons for dismissal. The Commission accepted the evidence of Glenpickle’s witnesses, a witness and a colleague, over the Applicant’s testimony. The Commissioner concluded the dismissal was not harsh, unjust, or unreasonable and therefore dismissed the Applicant’s unfair dismissal application.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure clear communication with employees regarding performance issues and provide written warnings where appropriate. It is crucial to attend Fair Work hearings or ensure proper representation to avoid default decisions. Employers should also verify assumptions and seek clarification from employees regarding their intentions and actions.
What it means for employees
Employees should ensure timely communication with their employer and the Fair Work Commission, especially when responding to requests for information. Providing all relevant materials and attending hearings is essential for a fair outcome. Employees should be aware that sworn evidence carries significant weight in Fair Work proceedings.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc391.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. Full-corpus advisor access is a paid product — Business Solo from $99/mo, 50% off your first 3 months for the first 100 signups.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →