[2025] FWC 391
What happened
the Applicant applied for unfair dismissal against Glenpickle Pty Ltd. Initially, the Fair Work Commission found the dismissal unfair due to Glenpickle's absence from the first hearing and the Applicant’s failure to provide materials to Glenpickle. However, the decision was revoked after Glenpickle argued the Applicant misled them into believing she had abandoned her claim. At a redetermination conference, the Applicant claimed a colleague promised visa sponsorship and then falsely accused her, leading to her dismissal. Glenpickle’s witnesses, a witness and a colleague, presented conflicting evidence, detailing performance concerns and a meeting where the Applicant was rude.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission revoked its earlier decision and redetermined the unfair dismissal application. The Commissioner found that the Applicant’s conduct at a meeting and her overall performance were valid reasons for dismissal. The Commission accepted the evidence of Glenpickle’s witnesses, a witness and a colleague, over the Applicant’s testimony. The Commissioner concluded the dismissal was not harsh, unjust, or unreasonable and therefore dismissed the Applicant’s unfair dismissal application.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure clear communication with employees regarding performance issues and provide written warnings where appropriate. It is crucial to attend Fair Work hearings or ensure proper representation to avoid default decisions. Employers should also verify assumptions and seek clarification from employees regarding their intentions and actions.
What it means for employees
Employees should ensure timely communication with their employer and the Fair Work Commission, especially when responding to requests for information. Providing all relevant materials and attending hearings is essential for a fair outcome. Employees should be aware that sworn evidence carries significant weight in Fair Work proceedings.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.