[2025] FWC 3838
Citation: [2025] FWC 3838
At a glance
- Employees affected
- 1
What happened
Adnan Ali was dismissed from Lindsay Australia Pty Limited on 14 October 2025. He applied to the Fair Work Commission for an unfair dismissal remedy on 6 November 2025, which was outside the 21-day filing period. Mr Ali claims he was told by a Transport Workers’ Union (TWU) representative, Mr Odeh, that the TWU would file the application on his behalf. Mr Odeh, a relatively new TWU employee, admitted to losing track of the application and subsequently filed it.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission considered whether to grant an extension of time for Mr Ali’s application. While the application was filed two days late, the Commission found that exceptional circumstances existed due to representative error. The Commission granted an extension of time to file the application, referencing previous Full Bench decisions that consider the actions of employees who rely on their representatives. The Commission found Mr Ali acted reasonably by seeking assistance and trusting the TWU’s assurances.
What it means for employers
Employers should be aware that delays caused by representative error can, in some circumstances, warrant an extension of time for unfair dismissal applications. While an employer isn't necessarily responsible for a representative's actions, the Commission will consider whether the employee acted reasonably and relied on assurances from their representative.
What it means for employees
Employees who rely on a union or other representative to file an unfair dismissal application may still have their application accepted even if it is filed late, particularly if they acted reasonably and received assurances from the representative. However, employees should be mindful of filing deadlines and consider following up with their representative to ensure timely action.
Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:
https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc3838.pdfWant more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.
Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.
Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →