[2025] FWC 3290
What happened
the Applicant was employed by Woolworths Group Limited from 2008 until his dismissal on May 8, 2025, when he was working as a Fruit and Veg Manager. He was dismissed due to alleged serious misconduct, specifically sending sexually suggestive messages to a co-worker, Ms Ghimire, between March 30 and April 7, 2025. the Applicant argues the messages were friendly and similar to those he sends to others. Following his dismissal, Woolworths discovered further conduct supporting the allegations. the Applicant claims the dismissal was unfair, citing procedural fairness issues, including not knowing the purpose of a meeting with a Store Manager and initially being denied a support person.
What was decided
The Fair Work Commission found the Applicant’s dismissal was not harsh, unjust, or unreasonable and dismissed his unfair dismissal application. The Commissioner noted the Applicant admitted to sending the messages and that Woolworths had a valid reason for dismissal based on his conduct and breaches of workplace policies. The Commissioner also granted Woolworths permission to be represented by a lawyer due to the complexity of the matter. The Commissioner determined the Applicant was protected from unfair dismissal, but ultimately found his dismissal was not unfair.
What it means for employers
Employers should ensure clear and consistent application of workplace policies, particularly regarding sexual harassment. Investigations should be conducted fairly, providing employees with adequate information and opportunities to respond to allegations. Thorough documentation of investigations and disciplinary processes is crucial. Training on workplace policies, including respectful workplace conduct, should be regularly updated and reinforced.
What it means for employees
Employees should be aware of workplace policies regarding appropriate communication and conduct. If facing disciplinary action, employees should seek clarification regarding the allegations and request support if needed. Understanding your rights and the process for unfair dismissal claims is important.
Want this applied to your situation?
Reading the decision is free. FairWork Mate goes further — it reads the full case library and applies precedents like this one to your specific facts, citing the cases as it reasons. General information, not a guaranteed outcome or legal advice.
Send your details to Liquid Employment Lawyers
Liquid Employment Lawyers is a paid legal service and our referral partner, not free Fair Work advice. FairWork Mate may receive a referral fee from Liquid Legal. Tell them what has happened and a member of their team will call you back. For free general guidance, use our tools or call the Fair Work Ombudsman on 13 13 94.
Prefer to read first? About Liquid Employment Lawyers · Not sure if you need a lawyer? Read the legal help guides
Want more cases like this?
FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The AI advisor answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus — awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts — with a citation to the underlying decision on every answer.
FairWork Mate AI
This is one decision. Pro reads all of them.
Free case pages cite the top 250 decisions. Pro opens the full Fair Work Commission and Federal Court library, cross-references your own situation against it, and cites the decision behind every answer — plus document upload, so it can read your letter or contract line by line. 150 questions a month, cancel anytime.
Renews monthly at A$29.99 until you cancel. By continuing you agree to our Terms.
Get notified on new Fair Work cases
Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.