Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 30 July 2025

[2025] FWC 294

Citation: [2025] FWC 294

What happened

Lee Witherden was employed as a stevedore by DP World Sydney Limited. On 7 June 2024, he was dismissed after testing positive for cocaine metabolites during a random drug test on 27 May 2024. Mr Witherden had worked for DP World for 25 years and had recently returned to work on light duties following a shoulder injury. DP World operates a container stevedoring terminal at Port Botany, where safety is critical. The company has a drug and alcohol policy and conducts random drug testing. Mr Witherden had previously disclosed taking prescription drugs to DP World.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission found that Mr Witherden breached DP World’s drug and alcohol policy, constituting a valid reason for dismissal. However, the Commission determined the dismissal was harsh and unreasonable. Factors considered included Mr Witherden’s long service, the lack of clarity in the policy regarding inactive metabolites, and DP World’s failure to consider rehabilitation options. The Commission ordered reinstatement and continuity of employment for Mr Witherden.

What it means for employers

Employers should ensure drug and alcohol policies are clear and comprehensive, particularly regarding inactive metabolites and hangover effects. Consideration should be given to rehabilitation options and alternatives to dismissal, especially for long-term employees with a history of service. Policies must be consistently applied and communicated to employees.

What it means for employees

Employees should be aware of their employer's drug and alcohol policies and understand the consequences of violations. Seeking help for substance abuse issues is crucial, and disclosing relevant medical conditions can be important.

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc294.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases