Skip to main content
FairWorkMate
FWCFair Work Commission · 29 September 2025

[2025] FWC 2686

Citation: [2025] FWC 2686

What happened

Anthony Mutton was employed by Artisan Pools Pty Ltd as a Construction Manager from February 2022, initially as a casual labourer and then permanently from July 2023. Concerns were raised by Mr Mutton's subordinate, Taylor Murphy, which led to a conversation with Toni Fields, the Administration Manager. Following this, Mr Mutton was summarily dismissed on February 24, 2025, based on alleged serious misconduct. Mr Mutton subsequently filed an unfair dismissal application. Artisan Pools contends the dismissal complied with the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code.

What was decided

The Fair Work Commission found Mr Mutton’s dismissal was unfair and dismissed Artisan Pools’ jurisdictional objection. The Commission determined the dismissal was not consistent with the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code. Compensation of $15,384.64 plus superannuation was ordered to be paid to Mr Mutton. The Commission noted a significant amount of factual dispute but found the dismissal lacked a reasonable basis.

What it means for employers

Employers, particularly small businesses, must ensure they have a reasonable basis for believing an employee has committed serious misconduct before dismissing them. Following the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code is not enough; a fair process, including proper investigation and warnings, is essential. Employers should avoid escalating workplace conflicts through aggressive communication and demands.

What it means for employees

Employees have the right to raise concerns about workplace issues without fear of unfair dismissal. If an employer dismisses you without a fair process, you may be entitled to compensation. It is important to document any concerns and communications with your employer.

unfair dismissalsmall businessserious misconductworkplace conflictfair process

Every statement above is drawn from the published decision. Read the original here:

https://www.fwc.gov.au/documents/decisionssigned/pdf/2025fwc2686.pdf

Want more cases like this?

FairWork Mate tracks Fair Work Ombudsman, Fair Work Commission and Federal Court decisions across Australia. The full dataset, with structured fields for awards cited, industry, penalty amounts and affected employee counts, is available through the Business API. FairWork Mate AI answers plain-English questions grounded on the full corpus.

Individual case summaries on this site are free. API + AI access is a paid product. Contact us for pricing or a 50% off first month.

Get notified on new Fair Work cases

Free email alerts when we publish new underpayment decisions, penalty orders, and workplace law updates.

Free forever. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.

This summary was drafted by AI from the published decision and reviewed before publishing. It is general information, not legal advice. For your specific situation, speak to the Fair Work Ombudsman (13 13 94) or a qualified lawyer. About these summaries & corrections →

← All cases